Kaleidoscope

  • October 18Contact us to be featured in #ThisIsWM2019!

  • September 7Join us for our weekly meetings on Thursdays in Room 115!

Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

Colin+Kaepernick+Nike+Ad%3A+%22Believe+in+something.+Even+if+it+means+sacrificing+everything.%22
Back to Article
Back to Article

Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

Colin Kaepernick Nike Ad:

Colin Kaepernick Nike Ad: "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything."

Colin Kaepernick Nike Ad: "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything."

Colin Kaepernick Nike Ad: "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything."

Maya Peña-Lobel, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






From memes, burnings, and everything in between, Nike puts meaning to the expression “any publicity is good publicity.”  

After releasing a new advertisement campaign with Colin Kaepernick as the face of the campaign, Nike faced serious backlash on social media and in the stock market.  However, since that initial crash, Nike’s stock has significantly increased and is now at an all-time high.

The first ad released was a black and white image of Kaepernick with the bold message, “Belief in something.  Even if it means sacrificing everything,” and, of course, it came with Nike’s signature line: “Just do it.”  The quote was not anything particularly unique for Nike, however, the image of Kaepernick prompted major controversy.  To understand why it is important to first know who Colin Kaepernick really is.

Originally just a San Francisco 49er’s quarterback, Kaepernick has become one of the most influential civil rights activists in recent years, simply by taking a knee.  Back in August 2016, the pre-season for the 49ers, Kaepernick, a 28-year-old man of color, sat while his teammates stood during the pre-game singing of the national anthem.  He continued to do so for two weeks, going unnoticed by the media. Then, on September 1, 2016, Kaepernick took a new approach and decided to kneel during the anthem. In doing so, he was able to make a stronger impression on his audience while being more respectful to the Americans who serve this country. 

Kaepernick’s actions have begun a mass protest that has encapsulated America and makes international headlines. The most important part of his protest, however, is not the “what,” but rather the “why?”

The national anthem is traditionally sung at major sporting events to honor the United States of America, and although it is not required by law, people generally stand with their hand over their heart during the rendering of the anthem.  Like the flag, it is intended to represent and celebrate all Americans from all walks of life. However, in light of countless acts of police brutality and clear evidence of racism in America, Kaepernick found it harder and harder to stand for something that did not stand for him, so he used his platform as a football star to help those without a voice.  “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,” Kaepernick told the media. “To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

Kaepernick’s sentiment was shared by other teammates and players all throughout the NFL.  Soon handfuls of players from almost every team kneeled, linked arms, or made some display of protest. It was not just African American players who participated in the protests–many of their white teammates joined in solidarity. As the protest spread throughout the NFL, people outside of football began to join the movement. Suddenly, prominent figures in other sports such as basketball started kneeling, and it was not just limited to sports–people were kneeling at any cantation of the anthem, whether it be at performances or in schools.  

But as the movement has gained traction and increased in popularity, so have its opponents. Some Americans view the anthem as a symbol of respect and commemoration for the fallen military and police officers who have served America, so they viewed kneeling during the anthem as un-American, disrespectful, and wrong. As a result, the NFL’s ratings plummeted, Kaepernick was unable to sign with a team, and a massive counter-movement began. Opposition to the national anthem protests escalated, fueled by President Trump condemning the protests in a rally speech and labeling Kaepernick as a “son of a b—-.”  Despite this, Kaepernick has come out and said that he in no way intends to disrespect our flag or those who serve our country, but that kneeling is purely a protest against racial injustices that plague people of color in America.

Though he is no longer an NFL quarterback, Kaepernick has become a champion of civil rights.  In the face of extreme opposition, he exercised his first amendment rights and sacrificed everything to stand up (or rather kneel) for what he believed in.  That’s why Nike chose him to lead their campaign. As a multi-billion dollar company, Nike knew this choice would cause backlash… and it did. Videos began surfacing online of people burning their Nike shoes and apparel.  Hordes of people took to Twitter to say that they would be switching to “stripes,” which refers to one of Nike’s biggest competing brands, Adidas. Directly following the release of the ad and a subsequent video featuring Kaepernick as the narrator with the tagline “Don’t ask if your dreams are crazy. Ask if they’re crazy enough,” Nike experienced a whopping $3.3 billion drop in market value.  However, their ad soon proved itself to be extremely effective, as Nike fully recovered from their stock market drop and far-surpassed its original value. It has surged 33% this year, closing at a stock value of $83.49 as of early this week. Additionally, Nike has sold out 61% more merchandise, and online sales of Nike apparel increased more than 31% since the release of the ad.

Whether you support Kaepernick and others’ efforts to fight against the racism epidemic in America, or view it as an attack on American heroes, it is impossible to deny the ingenuity of Nike ad producers. Sparking discussions everywhere, and generating both very negative and very positive publicity, Nike has pushed through it all and has proven that their controversial campaign was undoubtedly a success. Whether you go on to rip apart your Nike shirts or buy a whole new wardrobe from just Nike products, just remember: “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Features

    Three Village STEM Night 2018

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Science

    Discovering Mars: Gaining InSight

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Arts & Entertainment

    South Asian Representation in Comedy

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Op-Ed

    Does Christmas Come Too Early?

  • Op-Ed

    Scientists’ Open Letter Against Trump’s Gender Memo

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Commons

    Coco: Trick-or-Treat Street Rivalry or Cooperation?

  • Op-Ed

    LGBTQ+ Rights Threatened Again – Let’s Not Look Away

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Arts & Entertainment

    “Waste It On Me”: Steve Aoki and BTS Release New Single

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Arts & Entertainment

    Khalid’s New EP Release

  • Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?

    Showcase

    Girls Varsity Tennis Champions Proceed to States

Navigate Right
The student news site of Ward Melville High School
Colin Kaepernick: Champion of Civil Rights or Nike Marketing Ploy?